RE: [lisp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    > From: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@xxxxxxxxxxx>

    > I don't think that expecting code to handle two blocks (the
    > experimental one and the permanent one) is asking too much

We disagree. For me, it's extra code/complexity, and it buys you absolutely
nothing at all.

    > If a single permanent allocation that never changes is truly necessary

Allocation != reservation. Nobody is asking for the entire chunk to be
_allocated_ (i.e. given out), just that it be _reserved_ for this use.

	Noel


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]