Re: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/14/12 4:23 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> 	Agree. But also people (and perhaps organisations, that also are
> serious participants) in Latin America, Africa, and some parts of Asia
> has less income than their counterparts in North America. Some of the
> people from those places do serious efforts to attend the IETF.

I have very, very little doubt that operators in less wealthy
countries are running into problems that are unfamiliar to most
IETF participants, and that need some attention from protocol
weenies.  But, that said, work in the IETF is focused on
progressing documents and that requires continuity on the part
of participants.  If someone can only attend when a meeting
is geographically close, that suggests that they'll attend
one meeting every <bignum> years.  If they feel that remote
participation is sufficient, that's available now.  So, I'm
not sure that what you're arguing addresses the reason there's
an IETF in the first place, and IETF working method, in the
second.  I think that's probably the reason you're running into
pushback, even from people who think that the meetings should
move around more.

Melinda



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]