Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11.6.2012 17:17 , "Paul Wouters" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Stephan Wenger wrote:
>
>> So, to summarize, out of the 60 or so non-third-party disclosures that
>> have been made over the last 4+ months, only "a few" may or may not be
>> late; the rest almost certainly is not.
>
>Do we have a list of known IPR for which no disclosure was filed
>whatsoever (a.k.a. very very very late or possible never filing on
>purpose) ? Without that information, I don't think we can judge how
>well the Note Well is working currently.

Obviously, I do not have such information.  Let me return the favor: do
you know how much better a shorter, albeit badly aligned with policy, Note
Well would work?

Stephan

>
>Paul
>





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]