On Nov 6, 2012, at 10:25, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Perhaps "disclose that fact promptly." +1 Since not everyone is aware of what's going on in the IRTF: we recently made a minor modification to our IPR statement to that effect. See https://www.irtf.org/ipr One possibility would be that the IESG adopt what we did for the IRTF also for the IRTF... Lars
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>