RE: the usual mail stuff, was IETF...the unconference of SDOs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If someone wants to provide guidance on how to do a least bad job
with Outlook, that will be gratefully received. But advice that says
"don't use Outlook" will be filed with the advice that says "pick
another employer to work for".

-- 
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Communications Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194 |  Fax: +44 1245 242124
chris.dearlove@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | http://www.baesystems.com

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Levine
Sent: 09 September 2012 20:26
To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: the usual mail stuff, was IETF...the unconference of SDOs

----------------------! WARNING ! ----------------------
This message originates from outside our organisation,
either from an external partner or from the internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
Follow the 'Report Suspicious Emails' link on IT matters
for instructions on reporting suspicious email messages.
--------------------------------------------------------

I have to say that I'm baffled at the perverse pride that people seem
to take in being so technically backward that they're unable to handle
the mail that 99% of the world uses today.  While not being a fan of
overdecorated HTML and endless font changes, and strongly preferring a
mail program that lets me keep my fingers on the keyboard, I can deal
with it.  (I use Alpine, keep meaning to take another look at mutt.)
I remember how to punch drum cards, but I have no interest in using
one to send mail in 2012.

For the large majority of mail that is written in paragraphs rather
than tables, line wrapping is a useful feature, regardless of the
character set, particularly for those of us who sometimes read our
mail on a tablet or phone while changing planes.  For mail that is a
table and stuff has to line up in columns, use HTML tables. That's
what they're for.

R's,
John

PS: Yes, this is top posted.  You can deal with that, too.

>Unfortunately there's some stuff going around that line
>wrapping with hard line terminations is retrograde and goes
>back to punch cards.  I guess that's probably true but
>aside from the fact that I'm retrograde and go back to
>punch cards, myself, application line wrapping and flowed
>text don't deal well (yet) with multiple character sets,
>fonts, etc. and I'll take readability over application
>purity every single time.


********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]