I kind of like the idea of a liaison, as due to the work already done in the IETF there is no need to re-invent already proven standards and procedures and both sides may actually benefit. Any actions already in place / planned? Best regards Reinhard Schrage t: +49 (0) 5137 909540 m: +49 (0) 172 26.36.046 reinhard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: ippm-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ippm-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ruediger.Geib@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: 10 August 2012 08:34 To: matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx; ippm@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum Matt, I've read the liaision statement. The BBF informs us, that they plan to "create a standard set of Broadband performance metrics to address on-going regulatory, and consumer performance information needs." BBF asks for guidance and support. From the document I couldn't identify the architecture. I personally think IPPM members may volunteer to suggest IETF metrics to BBF. But to me that requires that the architecture is clearly defined (by BBF). Regards, Ruediger -----Original Message----- From: ippm-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ippm-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthew J Zekauskas Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:59 AM To: IETF IPPM WG Subject: [ippm] Fwd: Liaison Statement from the Broadband Forum FYI, if folks here want to review. Ron wants comments to ietf@xxxxxxxx. --Matt ------------------- Folks, The Broadband Forum has sent a liaison statement to the IETF regarding a "New Project - Broadband Access Service Attributes and Performance Measures". Click on the following link for details: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1179/. Please review and send comments to this list. -------------------------- Ron Bonica vcard: www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm