Hi All,
For any IETF WG discussion, we recommend reasons/references and equal recognistion for progress.
For any IETF WG evaluation/review, we recommend two way discussions for progress.
For any IETF WG decision, we recommend evaluation and then need rough consensus for progress.
For any IESG decision, we recommend WG input and internet community input and their consensus.
IMO, for any IETF-Participant's progress, he/she needs to know *why*
through discussions/questions, and he/she should make *decisions* for
the WG's I-Ds/RFCs with his/her community through rough consensus.
Decisions are accepted by community only if they are discussed or they
have clear reasons.
through discussions/questions, and he/she should make *decisions* for
the WG's I-Ds/RFCs with his/her community through rough consensus.
Decisions are accepted by community only if they are discussed or they
have clear reasons.
Please advise if you agree/disagree, thanks,
Best Regards
AB