On 10/08/12 00:03, Alexey Melnikov
wrote:
On
02/08/2012 10:46, Ben Campbell wrote:
Hi, thanks for the response. Comments
inline:
On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:29 PM, =JeffH
<Jeff.Hodges@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
-- section 7.2:
Am I correct to assume that the server must never just serve
the content over
a non-secure connection? If so, it would be helpful to
mention that, maybe
even normatively.
It's a SHOULD, see the Note in that section, so it's already
effectively stated normatively, though one needs to understand
HTTP workings to realize it in the way you stated it above.
Perhaps could add a simple statement as you suggest to the
intro para for section 7 Server Processing Model, to address
this concern?
I think something of the form SHOULD redirect to HTTPS, but MUST
NOT under any circumstances send the content unprotected would
improve the text.
Sounds good to me. (And yes, this is implied, but it doesn't hurt
to state explicitly.)
That's probably already implied, and a
reasonable implementor wouldn't due it anyway. But my experience
is that some readers will find strange interpretations whenever
you give them the wiggle room to do so, so it's better to be
explicit.
<hat="individual">
Agree with Alexey and Ben. Tobias
|