Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@xxxxxxxxx>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:20:51 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22726A0C09@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Thread-index: AQHNdgYTijpQ9GLKr0yzz5jOlfP895dRJa0AgACLAYD//5SLgA==
Thread-topic: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to

Lawyers may, in both cases.
Stephan

On 8.9.2012 09:45 , "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> From: Dave Cridland [dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> 
>> Does anyone other than historians honestly care what the original was?
>
>Does anyone honestly care what last month's version of the source code
>was?
>
>Dale
>

References:
- RE: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to
  - From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)

Prev by Date: RE: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to
Next by Date: Re: So, where to repeat?
Previous by thread: RE: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to
Next by thread: Re: RFC Errata: when to file, and when not to
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]