On 08/07/2012 10:19 PM, Martin Rex wrote: > Mark Andrews wrote: >> >> In message <5021742A.70804@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Barton writes: >>> On 08/07/2012 00:46, Martin Rex wrote: >>>> IPv6 PA prefixes result in that awkward renumbering. >>>> Avoiding the renumbering implies provider independent >>>> network prefix. >>> >>> ULA on the inside + https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6296 >> >> If you are changing your external connection you may as well just use >> ULA + PA. The DNS needs to be updated in either case, the firewall needs >> to be updated in either case. > > And what about running apps and network connections in the connected state? If they are connected external to your network then obviously they would have to be restarted ... but then you know that already. :) If "PI everywhere" were a feasible strategy at this time, I'd be first in line. But it isn't, so I think it's worthwhile discussing how we can do what we _can_ do, best.