----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@xxxxxxxxx> To: "IETF Administrative Director" <iad@xxxxxxxx> Cc: "IETF Discussion" <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 10:42 PM Subject: Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change <snip> > On the > other hand, travel on 27 March should be relatively easy. Precisely, which makes the original dates better for travel than the proposed alteration. This is a relatively early (Easter) holiday, which makes the run up to it frantic, so trying to get home on the 24th/25th/26th I would expect to be a nightmare, whereas the following week will be relatively quiet. Stay with the original dates. Tom Petch > > Cheers, > Andy > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:45 AM, IETF Administrative Director > <iad@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A reminder of the 6 August deadline for input. > > Thanks > > > > The IAOC is seeking community feedback on a proposed date change for IETF 95 > > scheduled for March 2016. > > > > Currently IETF 95 is scheduled for 27 March to 1 April 2016. 27 March is Easter. > > > > The IAOC is proposing IETF 95 be rescheduled for 20 - 25 March 2016 and would like > > feedback on those dates before making a decision. Comments appreciated to ietf@xxxxxxxx > > by 6 August 2012. > > > > Ray Pelletier > > IETF Administrative Director >