Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott,

would you say that drafts aimed for experimental status are "standards
work".

/Loa

On 2012-07-30 18:33, Scott O Bradner wrote:
2804 does not say not to talk about such things - or that such documents should
not be published as RFCs  - 2804 says that the IETF will not do standards work
in this area

Scott

On Jul 30, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

Under the long-standing IETF policy defined in RFC 2804, I trust
we will not be discussing this draft, or
draft-balaji-l2vpn-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis, in the IETF.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 30/07/2012 09:26, internet-drafts@xxxxxxxx wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


	Title           : Label-based Provider-Provisioned Lawful Intercept for L3 VPNs
	Author(s)       : Shankar Raman
                          Balaji Venkat Venkataswami
                          Gaurav Raina
                          Vasan Srini
                          Bhargav Bhikkaji
	Filename        : draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt
	Pages           : 12
	Date            : 2012-07-30

Abstract:
   In models of Single-AS and inter-provider Multi- Protocol Label
   Switching (MPLS) based Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) Lawful
   Intercept is a key requirement. For example, MPLS-based Layer 3 VPN
   models like VPLS and the like do not have any provider provisioned
   methods of lawful intercept that are comprehensive, quick and easy to
   provision from one single point. More particularly the auto-
   provisioning of lawful intercept for all sets of streams travelling
   between VPN sites and consequent re-direction of these streams to the
   appropriate government network has not been covered without multiple
   instances of having to configure the intercept at various points in
   the network both in the Single-AS case and the Inter-Provider VPN
   case.

   this paper, we propose a technique which uses a set of pre-defined
   labels called Lawful Intercept labels and a method for provisioning
   lawful intercept amongst the various PE devices using these labels
   both in the Single-AS and the inter-provider VPN cases. A single
   point of configuration is the key to this idea. The intercepted
   traffic is mirrored on a PE or a whole set of PEs or on all the PEs
   participating in the VPN. A technique called the Domino-effect
   provisioning of these Label-based Provider Provisioned Lawful
   Intercept mechanism is also outlined.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt



--


Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@xxxxx
Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
                                             +46 767 72 92 13


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]