The document spends more time on the taxonomy of the existing solutions
then I think is really warranted for a document purportory to be a
problem statement.
That said I think the document is a worst harmless, and describes the
problem fairly well.
joel
On 7/25/12 11:13 AM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Operations and Management Area
Working Group WG (opsawg) to consider the following document:
- 'Problem Statement for the Automated Configuration of Large IP
Networks'
<draft-ietf-opsawg-automated-network-configuration-04.txt> as
Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2012-08-15. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This memo discusses the steps required to bring a large number of
devices into service in IP networks in an automated fashion. The
goal of this document is to list known solutions where they exist, to
point out approaches proven to be problematic, and to identify gaps
that require further specifications.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-automated-network-configuration/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-automated-network-configuration/ballot/
The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1706/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1735/
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg