Hi all, I'd like to check that some recent minor changes to this document [1] don't cause technical or process-grief. The version [2] of the oauth bearer draft that underwent IETF LC and IESG evaluation had a normative dependency on the httpbis wg's authentication framework. [3] After resolving IESG discuss positions the authors and wg chairs felt that it would be better to replace the normative reference to the httpbis wg draft [3] with one to RFC 2617 [4] so that the OAuth drafts wouldn't be held in the RFC editor queue waiting on the httpbis wg to get done. I believe there is no impact on interop resulting from this change but there has been some disagreement about making it and how it was made. After some offlist discussion I think we now have an RFC editor note [5] that means that the current scheme of referring to RFC 2617 is ok. If there are no problems with this in the next week I'll move the document [1] along as-is. Thanks, Stephen. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-18 [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth [4] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2617 [5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer/writeup/