Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In theory yes, a signed document would be sufficient.

In practice it would then require an expert witness at $400/hr to
explain that it meant it was authentic.

The schedule of fees seems a reasonable response to a real cost being
imposed on the organization.

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> [assuming you mean the "go look it up" idea]
>
> We have the technology.  Surely a CMS signed object (or even just an HTTPS download) would provide adequate authentication that it came from the IETF.  And it doesn't seem like we would have a problem providing authenticated documents to the world.
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Bradner, Scott wrote:
>
>> great idea - just does not jive with the legal system which often need authenticated
>> copies of documents
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Jul 20, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
>>
>>>> On Jul 20, 2012, at 9:07 AM, IETF Administrative Director wrote:
>>>>> The draft policy entitled Draft Fee Policy for Legal Requests can be found
>>>>> at: <http://iaoc.ietf.org/policyandprocedures.html>
>>>
>>> Fine idea.
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]