Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/20/12 4:28 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
Changing something from experimental to proposed standard in a
process that will probably take 12 months will be unlikely change the
number of people implementing and deploying an RFC.

I'm going to take the liberty of mentioning that I spoke with Ron
earlier today about this.  Basically what he's asking is that there
be no process changes, and, I think, no policy changes, just
that IESG members should be mindful about how to phase experimental
stuff out when it's flopped.

Personally, I think he's correct about both cruft and mindfulness
and suspect that probably nearly everybody agrees with what he's
saying, anyway, but unfortunately it was presented in a form that
made it look like More Process.

Melinda


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]