Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/04/2012 03:52, Christian Huitema wrote:
> Of course, NAT does not really solve multi-homing either

it doesn't solve provider multihoming, but it solves end-user multihoming.
 For better or worse, there are ~40k asns announced on the internet, so
that problem is reasonably well contained.  There are many more multihomed
end-users whose multihoming requirements are solved completely adequately
by nat, and for whom ipv6 w/o NAT is a pointless pain with relatively high
cost and no real business benefit.

Nick



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]