On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Congestion Exposure WG (conex) > to consider the following document: > - 'ConEx Concepts and Use Cases' > <draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt> as an Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2012-04-12. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document provides the entry point to the set of documentation > about the Congestion Exposure (ConEx) protocol. It explains the > motivation for including a ConEx marking at the IP layer: to expose > information about congestion to network nodes. Although such > information may have a number of uses, this document focuses on how > the information communicated by the ConEx marking can serve as the > basis for significantly more efficient and effective traffic > management than what exists on the Internet today. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. Didn't Mr Briscoe just email that there was a BT IPR claim against this ID, related to re-ECN work he did/does for BT? > _______________________________________________ > conex mailing list > conex@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex