I support the allocation of an ACH codepoint to G.8113.1, not precluding the ITU-T to progress refinements to the protocol following its own process. As indicated by Russ, this approach "creates a situation where G.8113.1 succeeded or fails based on the ITU-T members actions, with no finger pointing at the IETF" which, in my opinion, will help the two SDOs to improve their cooperation on a fair and reciprocal basis. >-------- Original Message -------- >From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> >Sent: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:12:52 -0800 >To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx> >Subject: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC > >The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: >- 'Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T > Ethernet based OAM' > <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> as an Informational RFC > >The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2012-03-21. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf. org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > >Abstract > > This document assigns an Associated Channel Type code point for > carrying Ethernet based Operations, Administration, and Management > messages in the MPLS Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh). > >The file can be obtained via >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point/ > >IESG discussion can be tracked via >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point/ > > >No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >_______________________________________________ >IETF-Announce mailing list >IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > >