Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry,

s/some 3-4 conditions/some 3-4 dozen conditions/

Martin Rex wrote:
> 
> Martin Rex wrote:
> > 
> > So if the behaviour (how to exactly respond to queries for unknown
> > QTYPEs) is neither explicitly specified, nor likely have been part of
> > the usual/common interop tests performed by the vendor,
> > what you're left with might be "ureflected&untested guessing"
> > on part of the implementors to fill those gaps.
> 
> What you typically have is a certain amount of code processing a query,
> and some 3-4 conditions under which this code fails, and where the
> implementor will have to decide which RCODE to return.  The choices
> available in rfc1035 are:
> 
> RCODE           Response code - this 4 bit field is set as part of
>                 responses.  The values have the following
>                 interpretation:
> 
>                 0               No error condition
> 
>                 1               Format error - The name server was
>                                 unable to interpret the query.
> 
>                 2               Server failure - The name server was
>                                 unable to process this query due to a
>                                 problem with the name server.
> 
>                 3               Name Error - Meaningful only for
>                                 responses from an authoritative name
>                                 server, this code signifies that the
>                                 domain name referenced in the query does
>                                 not exist.
> 
>                 4               Not Implemented - The name server does
>                                 not support the requested kind of query.
> 
>                 5               Refused - The name server refuses to
>                                 perform the specified operation for
>                                 policy reasons.  For example, a name
>                                 server may not wish to provide the
>                                 information to the particular requester,
>                                 or a name server may not wish to perform
>                                 a particular operation (e.g., zone
>                                 transfer) for particular data.
> 
>                 6-15            Reserved for future use.
> 
> 
> The choice between RCODEs 1, 2 and 4 for failed AAAA queries
> might be fairly random, the description for 3 is slightly confusing
> in whether a DNS server might use this RCODE "creatively" by
> returning it without AA.
> 
> For an implementor that is being told "do not use use RCODE 4 for
> unknown QTYPES", not sending any response at all to an unsupported
> AAAA query seems like a reasonable choice.
> 
> 
> -Martin
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]