Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 26, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> 
>> 
>> I proposed a plan that I think might allow us to make progress
>> on that. I believe we could.
> 
> OK, great. 
> 
> Could you please explain why you think tying this effort to HTTP/2.0 is necessary to achieve that? To me that's the critical bit, and I still haven't seen the reasoning (perhaps I missed it).

I think I have *an* answer to this, though probably not *the* answer.

There's two stages to adoption - implementation and roll-out. Obviously you can't roll out "new authentication" before the browsers and servers implement it. For my website, I wouldn't roll out new auth if only one or two of the browsers out there implemented it. Even if all the big ones (IE, Firefox, Chrome, Opera) did, I would still have to provide a backwards compatibility authentication scheme to support older browsers. This would lead to both inconsistent UI and to ugly javascript that detects the browser version, and makes the roll-out slower.

If any HTTP/2.0 browser is bound to have "new authentication" it makes things much easier.

This could be circumvented by adding request headers that advertise capabilities, but I don't think we like those much.

Yoav


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]