Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/24/2012 07:38, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:54:32PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> In message <4F46BFDF.3070703@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Barton writes:
>>>
>>> 2782 was published 12 years ago this month. I suppose it can be
>>> considered mature enough to deploy at this point? :)
>>
>> +1000
> 
> Over in spfbis, people are arguing that the SPF RRTYPE should be
> deprecated and abandoned in SPF because nobody uses it because of
> practical difficulties in getting new RRTYPEs deployed.  What makes us
> think that the arguments in favour of SRV are going to find more
> fertile ground?

Because I emphasized the point that SRV has been around for 12 years? I
have enough experience to know how difficult it is to deploy new RRs.
SRV is not new.


Doug

-- 

	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]