On 24 feb 2012, at 03:54, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <4F46BFDF.3070703@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Barton writes: >> For my money it would be quite important for an HTTP 2.0 definition to >> make SRV DNS records a full-fledged participant in the standard. Minimum >> once a month there is someone asking for help on bind-users@ for which >> the answer is, "The solution to that _would_ be SRV records, if they >> were supported." >> >> 2782 was published 12 years ago this month. I suppose it can be >> considered mature enough to deploy at this point? :) > > +1000 Indeed. Including how to handle the comparison of domain name in the URL / domain name in the target in the SRV with the domain name in a cert. I.e. relationship with DANE. Patrik _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf