Re: Issues with "prefer IPv6" [Re: Variable length internet addresses in TCP/IP: history]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/23/2012 13:51, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Old news perhaps, but an unavoidable consequence of this is that the
> oft-repeated assertions that various systems have been "IPv6 ready for over 10
> years" don't involve a useful definition of the term "ready".

The OP specified "IPv4 only network." I suspect that if he had IPv6
connectivity his experience would have been quite different. I happily
use Windows XP on a dual-stack network, for example.


Doug (well, maybe "happily" is too strong a word, but you get the idea)

-- 

	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]