On 02/23/2012 13:51, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Old news perhaps, but an unavoidable consequence of this is that the > oft-repeated assertions that various systems have been "IPv6 ready for over 10 > years" don't involve a useful definition of the term "ready". The OP specified "IPv4 only network." I suspect that if he had IPv6 connectivity his experience would have been quite different. I happily use Windows XP on a dual-stack network, for example. Doug (well, maybe "happily" is too strong a word, but you get the idea) -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf