Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Point taken.

--
David Harrington
Director, Transport Area
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Ietfdbh@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1-603-828-1401





On 2/22/12 12:31 PM, "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>The earnest calls for better authentication on this thread appear to
>ignore the fact that the very things that are being requested were put
>out of scope for the websec WG in their charter. I hope that no one
>things that a WG in the Applications Area will be better equipped to come
>up with a better authentication mechanism than one in the Security Area.
>
>Asking the HTTPheads to guess what the securityheads might want is not a
>good way to design HTTP 2.0.
>
>Proposal: leave the httpbis WG charter as-is and re-charter the websec WG
>to consider what is needed in the HTTP authentication model. Later,
>recharter the websec WG to, you know, actually do the security work for
>authentication.
>
>--Paul Hoffman


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]