> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rbarnes@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 5:45 PM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: A nuance of interoperability reports > > Seems like it depends on your definitions of "abusive" and > "legitimate". Do you have an example? For a contrived example, let's say a registered HTTP header field that's only ever found to be present in web pages used by bad actors, but lots of them. Then HTTPbis comes up for standards track advancement and they're cleaning out the cruft. Would marking that field as deprecated or removing it completely be justified? -MSK _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf