not replying specific to this mail but to the tons that have arrived lately, are there some confusion out there that it is the amount of "votes" on ietf@ that make a do/do not on a draft? ... or just me missunderstanding this? anyway, great to see people participate :-) --- Roger J --- On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Erichsen, Kirk <kirk.erichsen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I fully support this draft and would like to see it progress to conclusion without further delay. > > With warm regard, > > Kirk Erichsen > Principle Technology Engineer > Time Warner Cable > ATG West > > > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Roger Jorgensen | rogerj@xxxxxxxxx | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no ; | roger@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf