Re: Variable length internet addresses in TCP/IP: history

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <201202142245.q1EMjAoU019793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Rex writes
:
> The necessary changes to applications would be minimal,
> the "happy eyeballs" contortion completely unnecessary
> and the security assessment for an IPv6 enabled network
> *MUCH* simpler.

Happy eyeballs just points out problems with multi-homing in general.
IPv4 has the *same* problem and sites spend 1000's of dollars working
around the issue which could have been addressed with a couple of
extra lines of code on the client side in most cases.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]