Re: [rfc-i] From Pandoc To RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Any reason not to go the Wiki route and just make sure it doesn't get corrupted?

On Oct 29, 2011, at 8:23 PM, John C Klensin wrote:

> 
> 
> --On Saturday, October 29, 2011 14:51 -0400 Russ Housley
> <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I just think we need a volunteer to take over maintenance of
>> the existing page.
> 
> That would be fine (and I noticed that Marshall volunteered, for
> which I'm grateful), but part of my hope was that we could
> institutionalize that page or something like it, e.g., make sure
> that someone was responsible for being sure that there was a
> volunteer.
> 
>    john
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]