On 9/24/11 11:24 AM, "Cameron Byrne" <cb.list6@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Let's avoid having yet another thread where there is no consensus but the > parties continue to restate their claims over and over. Fair enough. We're discussing the reservation of a prefix; the context is a foregone conclusion. > Now, if you are in the business of selling ipv4 address space on the > secondary market, as folks have linked to you before on the nanog list, you > must like the idea of pushing out ipv6 deployment in favor of the broken > nat444 ipv4 ecosystem.... platitudes about ipv6 aside. > Here you claim to be "friends" with ipv4 black-marketeers > http://diswww.mit.edu/charon/nanog/139751 Yes, I'm friends with many people. Some of them vote for the opposite political party as me, some of them work for my competitors, etc. I may agree with some friends, disagree with others, and even hold competing ideas in my mind at the same time. Yet I remain my own person. -Benson _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf