Re: Pre-IETF RFCs to Historic (not really proposing)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My impression is that the IETF quite regularly does new things that break current, actively used, maintained, and even standards-track protocols.  Maybe we should worry about those before worry about breaking older protocols.

Keith

On Sep 16, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote:

> Scott,
> 
> On one hand, most of these RFCs do not harm the Internet. However, if we don't clean house periodically, we are left with the following questions:
> 
> 1) In the future, does the IETF have the latitude to do things that might break these old protocols?
> 2) If not, must the IETF maintain a cadre of people who are familiar with these old protocols to ensure that they are not broken?
> 3) If we don't maintain a cadre of people familiar with these RFCs, how should the community react to errata against them?
>                                 Ron
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>> Scott O Bradner
>> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 2:37 PM
>> To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
>> Cc: IETF Discussion
>> Subject: Re: Pre-IETF RFCs to Historic (not really proposing)
>> 
>> I'm fully supportive of reclassifying any RFCs that pose a risk to the
>> Internet
>> to historic but fail to see the usefulness of doing so for RFCs that
>> describe
>> unused but non-harmful technologies - seems like busywork and useless
>> at best.
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> I've recently received a message from Ronald Bonica, one of the ADs,
>> proposing undertaking an effort to reclassify many pre-IETF (pre-1000)
>> RFCs as Historic.  However, I initially had a concern regarding
>> community consensus on such effort, and whether it will be accepted so
>> that the IESG may claim the former.  Since I've already suggested a
>> very similar proposal, and there was a negative reaction of community,
>> I assumed the same would happen in the case Ronald pursued the work and
>> forwarded it to the IESG.  So am I right?
>>> 
>>> Mykyta
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ietf mailing list
>>> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]