ps - as Keith points out - a round of this type of effort was undertaken by the newtrk working group a while back (I was the chair and did not see much reason to do so at the time but there was consensus in the WG to proceed) - I will note that it took quite a bit of work to ensure that technologies were actually unused Scott On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Scott O Bradner wrote: > I'm fully supportive of reclassifying any RFCs that pose a risk to the Internet > to historic but fail to see the usefulness of doing so for RFCs that describe > unused but non-harmful technologies - seems like busywork and useless at best. > > Scott > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I've recently received a message from Ronald Bonica, one of the ADs, proposing undertaking an effort to reclassify many pre-IETF (pre-1000) RFCs as Historic. However, I initially had a concern regarding community consensus on such effort, and whether it will be accepted so that the IESG may claim the former. Since I've already suggested a very similar proposal, and there was a negative reaction of community, I assumed the same would happen in the case Ronald pursued the work and forwarded it to the IESG. So am I right? >> >> Mykyta >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf