My recollection is that this has already been done to a large degree. Also, focusing on this specific set of RFCs would be a lot of work, for very little actual value to the community. On the other hand, I'd be very much in favor of IETF periodically reviewing ALL standards-track RFCs for applicability. But reclassifying as Historic is rarely appropriate. Instead what should be done is to write an applicability statement for the protocols for which none exist, or for which the previous applicability statements are no longer correct. Keith On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Dear all, > > I've recently received a message from Ronald Bonica, one of the ADs, proposing undertaking an effort to reclassify many pre-IETF (pre-1000) RFCs as Historic. However, I initially had a concern regarding community consensus on such effort, and whether it will be accepted so that the IESG may claim the former. Since I've already suggested a very similar proposal, and there was a negative reaction of community, I assumed the same would happen in the case Ronald pursued the work and forwarded it to the IESG. So am I right? > > Mykyta > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf