On Sep 12, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > On 9/12/2011 11:41 AM, Keith Moore wrote: >> I think at this point we're just talking past each other, but I >> simply disagree with your assertion that RFC 2782 should be taken as >> a prohibition on using SRV RRs in any way other than defined in RFC >> 2782. > > It might be useful to explain to this list what you think a spec means, so we can understand what you think it means to comply with a spec. I think RFC 2782 inappropriately specified SRV RRs by defining both the label syntax and the RDATA syntax at the same time. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf