Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sep 6, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> 
>> I wonder if we would be better off discarding the concept of layers
>> of standards, call PS "Standards track", and instead specify a way
>> to report interoperability tests.
> 
> +1.  Perhaps along with periodically updated applicability statements.

   This is a serious proposal...

   It has been a serious proposal ever since newtrk.

   Details differ, but really not significantly: some folks want to
update 2026 to do this; others want to do it first and decide later
whether to update 2026; others want to do it and let the IESG decide
whether to use it as input to deciding about advancing levels.

   Many distinctions; no real difference...

--
John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]