+1. I like that phrasing. It summarizes the requirements document pretty well
Yet it never was worded that way when this WG started debating mainly WS. In fact, I don't recall any other protocol being discussed on this board so I disagree with the term "requirement" in this very case.
- Sylvain
http://www.defuze.org
http://twitter.com/lawouach
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf