Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[BA] My comment is that having guidelines for this could help make the advancement process more predictable.  Thank you for working on this.   

Jari Arkko said:

During the discussion of the two maturity levels change, a question was brought up about DISCUSSes appropriate for documents that advance on the standards track. We discussed this in the IESG and I drafted some suggested guidelines. Feedback on these suggestions would be welcome. The intent is to publish an IESG statement to complement the already existing general-purpose DISCUSS criteria IESG statement (http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html). 
 
Here are the suggested guidelines for documents that advance to IS: 
 
http://www.arkko.com/ietf/iesg/discuss-criteria-advancing.txt 
 
Comments appreciated. Please send comments either on this list or to the IESG (iesg@xxxxxxxx) in time before our next telechat (Thursday, September 8, 2011).
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]