> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keith Moore > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:51 PM > To: Hector > Cc: IETF discussion list > Subject: Re: 2119bis > > On Aug 31, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Hector wrote: > > > I'm having a hard time understanding why you continue to work on the > > basis that people "fail to read" essentially implying stupidity in the > > process. > > I work on the basis of "fail to read" because I've seen countless > examples of it. And stupidity is not the same thing as lack of > diligence. Ditto. And I also see a lot of creative interpretation. There's little we can do to thwart any of those problems; some people read what they want to read and do so in a vacuum. > As far as I'm concerned, Tony's I-D is a nonstarter, and therefore > irrelevant. I certainly agree that it's irrelevant to this discussion, plus it's only an I-D at this point anyway. We're talking about a published BCP here. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf