On 8/30/2011 11:19 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
Hello all, I've observed several problems with submission mechanism for RFC Errata. Here they are: First, we have only two types of errata - Technical or Editorial. In presence of <http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/rfc-metadata-errata.html>, "IESG Statement on IESG Processing of RFC Errata concerning RFC Metadata", I think the third type is necessary - Metadata.
I agree with this part of the proposal, at least. -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf