RE: 2119bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of HLS
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:00 AM
> To: IETF discussion list
> Subject: Re: 2119bis
> 
> > I had never thought of this before.  I kind of like the idea, especially since SHOULD
> > has always meant "MUST unless you really know what you're doing"
> 
> Such an odd reading.  Does it mean you MUST because you could not
> handle it otherwise?

I'm sorry if you think it's odd, but it's correct.  Read RFC2119 again:

3. SHOULD   This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
   may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
   particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
   carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]