RE: 2119bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-08-30 at 07:36:58, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> for long enough, I finally decided to submit an I-D that is intended 
> to obsolete RFC 2119. 

<bike-shed>
IS THERE ANY CHANCE OF AGREEING THAT SHOUTING IS BAD?  (i.e., Burger's first anti-law.)  As opposed to mandating that requirements ought to be shouted.  Lowercase "must" can be as effective as uppercase as long as it is consistently applied.
</bike-shed>

On a more serious note, many documents lean too heavily on conformance terms.

A gentle reminder that conformance terms ought to be sparingly used might not go astray here.  It's just like the F-bomb, it's a F-ing big deal if used infrequently enough.  People are more likely to pay attention when it's rare.

--Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]