Re: 2119bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2119bis
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:47:11 -0400
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <003401cc66b1$d35af5a0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>

On Aug 29, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Randy Presuhn wrote:

RFC 2119 SHOULD is appropriate when the "UNLESS" cases are
known (or suspected) to exist, but it is not practical to exhaustively
identify them all.

+1.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- 2119bis
  - From: Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: 2119bis
  - From: Thomas Narten
- Re: 2119bis
  - From: Eric Burger
- Re: 2119bis
  - From: Randy Presuhn

Prev by Date: Re: 2119bis
Next by Date: Re: 2119bis
Previous by thread: Re: 2119bis
Next by thread: Re: 2119bis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]