I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-23 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2011–8–16 IETF LC End Date: 2011–8–19 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: I find that the document provides in depth testing procedures and reporting. What I think may be helpful is a recommendation about how many times to repeat each of the tests to get more accurate results. Is there any experience. Maybe it will be good to have some text on experience from actual testing that were done based on the document. Nits/editorial comments: I noticed that the issue of normative references was discussed and I had similar observation since the references in the terminology section are normative and Po11t is in draft forms. Did you consider why they are normative and not informative. |
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf