+1
d/
--
Dave Crocker
bbiw.net
via mobile
-----Original Message-----
> I pretty much agree, although one form of discuss might be
> reasonable: "This document needs to be recycled at Proposed
> Standard because of the following *observed* interoperability
> problem:...".
> In other words, once we have got this BCP out (soon, please),
> the IESG should update the DISCUSS criteria specifically to
> narrow them for the PS->IS transit
+1
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf