Hi Medel,
At 17:57 07-08-2011, GT RAMIREZ, Medel G. wrote:
1)Is there such thing as a "good enough" Criteria to handle this
concern?
Glen Zorn asked a question during the last plenary and there was a
discussion [1] about "criteria" on this mailing list.
To be fair, I'll quote a message from Warren Kumari [2]:
"While not all ADs read all drafts, most read a large fraction
of them (and read them carefully and thoughtfully enough to
catch a number of large issues (and nits) *that were not caught
in LC*) -- I think that they deserve recognition for performing
a valuable and un-fun function..."
2)Or as usual it passes "rough consensus" process?
The process is based on consensus and not "rough consensus".
Regards,
-sm
P.S. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg67494.html
1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg68008.html
2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg68008.html
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf