> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Koch > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:04 AM > To: IETF Discussion > Subject: Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list > > I-D announcements are already copied to the relevant WG for WG drafts. > Non-WG drafts may have the WG name in between '-' in the filename, > allowing an easy identification of the WG the author thinks the draft is > relevant to. A discussion mailing list is not mandatory for a draft > and it could be that the author is still looking. As a courtesy to > the reader, i've used this kind of hint in the past where applicable. > But please, let us not add another mandatory boilerplate piece of text. +1. I don't agree that there's a problem to solve here. The IESG is already in place to prevent end-runs around established procedure or conflicts with active working groups. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf