Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 2, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

>> BTW, has anyone noticed the trend of doing more and more on the Sunday and
>> Saturday *before* IETF week?
> 
> Very much so. 
> Workshops, joint meetings, design teams...
> In Prague, a good number of people started in Friday.
> 
> Nothing wrong with that, but it does put paid to the idea that the IETF is 4.5
> day meeting, and that squeezing it at one end will restrain it. Toothpaste-like,
> squeezing the closing Friday will only cause more spillage on the opening
> Sunday.
> 
> OTOH, I have good reason to think that the application of more focus by WGs
> during their meetings *could* reduce the pressure on the whole schedule. Thus,
> the perennial thread on not presenting drafts at WG meetings would surely bear
> fruit.

	Indeed. A few people were discussing this during one of the meetings last week where the agenda was packed to the gills, and the WG chairs were cutting off discussion after just 1 or 2 people at the mic.  We were all wondering why we spent any time allowing for the presentation and instead should have allowed the full 5/10 minute slot for discussions/debate.  Even better, what if we spent a whole 15 minutes discussing or debating?!

	--Tom



> 
> Adrian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]