+1 with Adam ----- Original Message ----- From: Adam Roach [mailto:adam@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 04:38 PM To: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule I'd like to join the sparse voices in speaking out against this plan. By Friday, I'm pretty well on a local meal schedule. Pushing lunch back by 2 hours would pretty well on guarantee that I'd be sugar-crashed and less coherent than normal by the end of Session II. /a On 8/1/11 10:10 AM, Russ Housley wrote: > I am discussing the possibility with the Secretariat and the IESG. I will report back to the community as soon as possible. > > Russ > > >>>> On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: >>>> >>>>> Something like this: >>>>> 8:30-11:00 Session I >>>>> 11:15-12:15 Session II >>>>> 12:30-13:30 Session III >>>> I really like it, as there are a bunch of post-IETF stuff, some of >>>> which starts in the afternoon and thus conflicts with the IETF. > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf