Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In your letter dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:56:51 -0400 you wrote:
> In the absence of a coherent instruction from IETF for a phase-out
> plan, declaring this protocol historic under the current proposed
> language, will do precisely that.  Please please please, if IETF
> wants 6to4 to die, then publish a phase-out plan so that the
> current users of 6to4 can have fair warning before the relays go
> dark and forthcoming hardware/software upgrades rip the feature
> out from under them.

I would hope that big companies like Apple would actually do an impact
analysis before removing a feature. 

Big content providers can measure how much 6to4 is enabled, so they can
probably say something about trends. But that doesn't say much about how many
users actually care about 6to4. Vendors seem to be best equiped to analyse 
the users' need for 6to4.

I don't think relay operators have expressed a desire for a specific cut off 
date. So I guess they just figure out for themselves when to switch off the
relays.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]