In message <22F6318E46E26B498ABC828879B08D4F1D272D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Huitema writes : > > After some discussion, the IESG is attempting to determine whether there is IETF consensus to do the following: > > > > - add a new section to draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic > > - publish draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic as INFORMATIONAL > > > > draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic will obsolete RFCs 3056 and 3068 and convert their status to HISTORIC. It will also contain > > a new section describing what it means for RFCs 3056 and 3068 to be classified as HISTORIC. The new section will say that: > > I do not think this is a good idea, and I am certainly not part of the "consensus." Seconded. > -- Christian Huitema > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf